Home
References
week 01, 09 January
Defining the language of sections in the Yingzao fashi
week 02, 16 January
Rules and gaps in the Yingzao fashi
week 03, 23 January
Defining style formally: shape grammar
week 04, 30 January
Chinese new year
week 05, 06 February
A shape grammar of the Yingzao fashi
week 06, 13 February
Change of cai over time
week 07, 20 February
Parametric change over time
week 08, 27 February
An extant building
week 09, 06 March
Consultations, field trip
week 10, 13 March
Presentations: individual analysis
week 11, 20 March
Writing 1
week 12, 27 March
Writing 2
week 13, 03 April
No class
week 14, 10 April
Consultations
week 15, 17 April
Consultations
week 16, 24 April
Review week
week 17, date TBA
Conclusion
|
Housekeeping
About the course
Writing
What do you know about wood-frame architecture (in the Tang, Song, and
Yuan dynasties)? What questions do you have?
Course preview: defining a language of sections
Here are 18 sections from the Yingzao fashi. Why do they look
similar? Evaluate whether a previously unknown section is in the language.
Create a new section in the language.
Definitions
-
Design
-
“An n-ary relation among drawings, other kinds of
descriptions, and correlative devices as needed” (Stiny 1990,
97). In other words, the representation of a building, not the building
itself.
-
Set
-
“[A] collection, possibly infinite, of distinct numbers, objects,
etc., that is treated as an entity in its own right, and with identity
dependent only upon its members” (The HarperCollins dictionary
of mathematics).
-
Generative and enumerative definitions
-
See below.
-
Language of designs
-
A set of designs based on a common generative definition.
-
Style
-
“When several buildings each create a similar impression, they
are said to exemplify a particular architectural style” (Stiny
and Mitchell 1978, 17, original emphasis). In other words, a language
of designs that are perceived to be similar.
-
Corpus
-
A body of designs on which an analysis is based (adapted from The
new shorter Oxford English dictionary: “A body of spoken
or written material on which a linguistic analysis is based”).
Defining style (Stiny and Mitchell)
Stiny and Mitchell (1978, 17) give three tests for understanding (or
characterizing or defining) a style.
Given a finite corpus of buildings that are perceived to be alike in
some sense, the problem of style consists of characterizing the basis
for this likeness. Ideally this characterization has three main purposes:
(1) it should clarify the underlying commonality of structure and appearance
manifest for the buildings in the corpus; (2) it should supply the conventions
and criteria necessary to determine whether any other building not in
the original corpus is an instance of the style; and (3) it should provide
the compositional machinery needed to design new buildings that are
instances of the style. If the characterization of a particular architectural
style is to have any explanatory or predictive value, it must satisfy
these descriptive, analytic, and synthetic tests of adequacy.
Defining a language of sections generatively
Generative and enumerative definitions
Simon (1996, 210–211) calls them state descriptions and process
descriptions. What we used in the Flash grammar is a generative definition.
It helps us answer all three tests in a way that an enumerative definition
cannot.
Clearly this generative characterization satisfies the preceding criteria:
the rules of the grammar elucidate the structure and appearance of villa
plans; any villa can be determined to be an instance of the style by
simply determining whether there is a sequence of rule applications
that generates its plan; and plans of villas not already existing can
be generated by the grammar (Stiny and Mitchell 1978, 17).
We can change the language by changing the definition.
-
{2, 4, 6, 8} = {x : x = 2n, n
∈ N, n ≤ 4}
-
{2, 4, 6, 8, 10} = {x : x = 2n, n∈
N, n ≤ 5}
-
{2, 4, 6, 8, …} = {x : x = 2n,
n ∈ N}
-
{3, 6, 9, 12} = {x : x = 3n, n
∈ N, n ≤ 4}
One-minute paper
What is the main thing you learned? What is your main question?
Assignment 1 out
Begin with the corpus of 18 sections from the Yingzao fashi.
Define a language that includes this corpus. Modify the Flash grammar
by adding, deleting, or constraining rules (page 1 only). Generate all
the sections in the language. If some of the sections seem not to belong,
or if some that do belong are missing, revise the grammar again. Show
the final version of the rules, all the sections in the language, and
some sections not in the language.
Appraise the software briefly. What is the best aspect? What is the
worst aspect? How would you improve it?
Next class
Rules and gaps in the Yingzao fashi
References
Simon, Herbert A. 1996. The sciences of the artificial. 3rd
ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Stiny, George. 1990. What is a design? Environment and planning
B: planning & design 17: 97–103.
Stiny, George, and William J. Mitchell. 1978. The Palladian grammar.
Environment and planning B: planning & design 5: 5–18.
|